NP-Hard Manipulations of Voting Schemes
نویسنده
چکیده
Voting schemes are common social choice function that allow voters to aggregate their preferences in a socially desirable way. Unfortunately, the GibbardSatterthwaite theorem states that many of these schemes are susceptible to manipulation. Thus, a highly desirable quality, such that a scheme is resistant to manipulaion, is lacking in voting schemes. Since non-manipulability cannot be guaranteed, researchers have investigated other ways to discourage manipulation. This research has led in the direction of voting schemes which are difficult to manipulate. The investigation of these schemes has greater importance in the area of multiagent systems. In this case, voters are computer agents who can determine strategic voting schemes much quicker than their human counterparts. Thus, having voting schemes which are computationally difficult to manipulate is a desirable quality in these settings.
منابع مشابه
Complexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules
We investigate manipulation of the Borda voting rule, as well as two elimination style voting rules, Nanson’s and Baldwin’s voting rules, which are based on Borda voting. We argue that these rules have a number of desirable computational properties. For unweighted Borda voting, we prove that it is NP-hard for a coalition of two manipulators to compute a manipulation. This resolves a long-standi...
متن کاملComplexity of and Algorithms for Borda Manipulation
We prove that it is NP-hard for a coalition of two manipulators to compute how to manipulate the Borda voting rule. This resolves one of the last open problems in the computational complexity of manipulating common voting rules. Because of this NP-hardness, we treat computing a manipulation as an approximation problem where we try to minimize the number of manipulators. Based on ideas from bin ...
متن کاملManipulation Can Be Hard in Tractable Voting Systems Even for Constant-Sized Coalitions
Voting theory has become increasingly integrated with computational social choice and multiagent systems. Computational complexity has been extensively used as a shield against manipulation of voting systems, however for several voting schemes this complexity may cause calculating the winner to be computationally difficult. Of the many voting systems that have been studied with regard to electi...
متن کاملVoting in Cooperative Information Agent Scenarios: Use and Abuse
Social choice theory can serve as an appropriate foundation upon which to build cooperative information agent applications. There is a rich literature on the subject of voting, with important theoretical results, and builders of automated agents can benefit from this work as they engineer systems that reach group consensus. This paper considers the application of various voting techniques, and ...
متن کاملWhere are the hard manipulation problems?
One possible escape from the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem is computational complexity. For example, it is NP-hard to compute if the STV rule can be manipulated. However, there is increasing concern that such results may not reflect the difficulty of manipulation in practice. In this tutorial, I survey recent results in this area. The Gibbard Satterthwaite theorem proves that, under some simple...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005